Children, Youth and Family Consortium Home Page University of Minnesota Systemwide Home Page
University of Minnesota Systemwide Home Page
Children, Youth and Family Consortium Home Page







Quick Research







Center of Excellence in Children's Mental Health

 

President's Initiative on Children, Youth, and Families

President's Initiative on Children, Youth and Families

 

Growing Concerns

Growing Concerns
A childrearing
question-and-answer
column with
Dr. Martha Farrell Erickson

 

Seeds of Promise

Seeds of Promise
A series of public reports that blend research and practical strategies.

 

University of Promise
Realizing the University's Promise for Minnesota Children and Youth

 

Parenting, Social Class and the Achievement Gap

by Rebecca Jacobsen and Tamara Wilder

PhD Candidates in Politics and Education, Teachers College, Columbia University

Policy conversations regarding the achievement gap often focus solely on the role of the school. However, researchers have found that the gap actually appears before children begin school.  Different social classes have, on average, different parental practices that impact children’s readiness for academic success. Understanding the ways in which these differences affect academic success will help policy makers and practitioners develop programs that narrow the gap before children even enter school.

Before outlining the various social class differences in parental practices and activities that support academic success, it should be noted that we are speaking about average characteristics. For example, researchers have found that on average, mothers who were on welfare spoke 600 words per hour to their infants while professional parents spoke over 2,000 words per hour. They estimated that by age 4, children of professional parents heard 45 million words while children of mothers who were on welfare only heard 13 million words creating a 30 million word gap. However, this is not to say that all professional parents speak 2,000 words per hour to their children; of course, some speak less. Furthermore, there are some mothers who are on welfare who speak far more than 600 words an hour to their infants. But, on average, these social class differences contribute to lower class children entering school with smaller vocabularies.

Social class also impacts pre-reading activities that take place in the home. While parents of all classes read to their children, how they read a story can vary. Lower class parents often ask more factual questions while reading a story. (What color is the girl’s dress? Where is the dog?) Upper class parents tend to ask more complex questions that require children to use critical thinking skills. (What do you think will happen next? How is this trip to the zoo similar to your trip?) These different approaches to reading impact a child’s reading ability upon entering school. Upper and middle class children who have become accustomed to interacting with text on a more complex level will, on average, show greater progress on standardized tests.

Approaches to encouraging or reprimanding children’s behavior also affect academic achievement. Toddlers of professionals receive an average of six encouragements per reprimand while toddlers of parents on welfare receive two reprimands per encouragement—a reversal of the ratio. Children receiving more encouragement from an early age will build self confidence and willingness to try new activities, both of which lead to greater success in the classroom.     

Disciplinary differences between social classes, often as a result of the types of daily experiences had by parents at work, also impact learning. Parents with professional occupations who are expected to ask questions and solve problems at work will naturally bring these traits home. Upper and middle class parents are more likely to negotiate disciplinary issues like bedtime or dinner choices and are more likely to explain why particular rules are being implemented. Working class parents, whose work is often more routine and authoritative, tend to instruct children without extended explanations. When upper and middle class children arrive at school, their experiences, on average, make them more comfortable asking the teacher questions and clarifying rules.

These differences in how one views authority also impact parent-teacher relationships. In an extensive study of home-school relationships, Annette Lareau found that working class parents believed teachers had specialized knowledge and thus, did not feel it was their place to intervene or supplement with lessons at home. In stark contrast, upper class parents interviewed believed they were partners with teachers and often guided and supervised their child’s educational experiences through supplemental lessons at home or though negotiations for special provisions at school. 

The cumulative effect of these various social class differences in parenting style is that upper and middle class children arrive at school with experiences and abilities that give them an educational advantage.

Because many of these gaps begin to appear long before children arrive at school, programs to close them must begin early in a child’s life. One successful program for teenage mothers was a home visiting nurse. They not only provided well baby care but also parenting tips and techniques. In one study where teen mothers received such home visits from pregnancy through age 2, follow ups showed that their children developed fewer behavior problems at school and had higher test scores.

Early childhood care and education programs can also help low income children acquire social and academic skills prior to entering school. Such programs are most effective if they begin when the children are toddlers and are staffed by instructors with a degree in early childhood education.

Home-school connections can be emphasized in early childhood programs and elementary school through the creation of a home-school teacher position. Ideally, the home-school teacher visits to help parents in their homes to support classroom instruction, and offer workshops on academic activities and disciplinary practices that facilitate learning. To supplement more formalized parent-teacher conferences, the home-school teacher can act as a liaison throughout the school year to explain school materials such as test results and pedagogical practices to parents.    

Schools can also encourage active parents to become parent mentors. Parents themselves are invaluable resources to one another. Many lower class parents are isolated from one another, lacking information about after school programs, specific teachers, and in-school services that most middle and upper class parents receive through informal parent networks. Because lower income parents may perceive teachers to be experts, parent mentors are particularly important to bridge this gap. 

Without efforts focused on child-rearing practices and home-school connections, the achievement gap will persist despite even the most extensive school reforms. There are many causes of the achievement gap. Enabling all parents to provide their children with the home environment and skills proven to be influential for academic achievement may go further in narrowing the achievement gap than school-based reform alone.

Editor’s Note: 

This article, Parenting, Social Class and the Achievement Gap, was commissioned by CYFC based on the book Class and Schools: Using Social, Economic and Educational Reform to Close the Black-White Achievement Gap by Richard Rothstein. CYFC staff read the book in preparation for our work on Educational Disparities.  Rothstein’s approach is that the achievement gap requires solutions from many sectors of the community, as per the Circle of Influence Framework, rather than just schools alone. Rothstein is a research Associate with the Economic Policy Institute, and a lecturer at Teacher’s College, Columbia University.  The authors, Rebecca Jacobsen and Tamara Wilder, describe themselves as junior colleagues of Richard Rothstein.  Both are PhD Candidates in Politics and Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Hart, Betty and Todd Risely. 1995. Meaningful Differences. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.

Britto, Pia Rebello and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn (Eds.) 2001. The Role of Family Literacy Environments in Promoting Young Children's Emerging Literacy Skills: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. New York: Jossey-Bass; Mikkulecky, Larry. 1996. Family Literacy: Parent and Child Interactions. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. <http://www.ed.gov/pubs/FamLit/parent.html>

Hart and Risley, 1995.

Rothstein, Richard. 2004. Class and Schools: Using Social, Economic and Educational Reform to Close the Black-White Achievement Gap. Economic Policy Institute: Washington, D.C.

Lareau, Anette. 2000. Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Olds, David, et al. 1997. “Long-Term Effects of Home Visitation on Maternal Life Course and Child Abuse and Neglect: Fifteen-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 278(8): 637-543; Olds, David. L. et al. 1999. “Prenatal and Infancy Home Visitation by Nurses: Recent Findings.” Future of Children. 9(1): 44-65.

Additional Resources

Teachers College - Columbia University

A Conversation With Richard Rothstein

Reforms That Could Help Narrow the Achievement Gap

 

Search Our Site

 

Minnesota Children's Summit 2003

Minnesota Childrens' Summit

Consortium Connections
The Consortium's publication,
printed twice yearly.

 


Home | About CYFC | Policy | Experts Database | Publications

Features | Events Calendar | Community Partnerships


Communities | Early Childhood | School-Age Children | Adolescents

Family Relationships and Parenting | Seniors and Intergenerational Issues

The Children, Youth and Family Consortium's Website is a forum for sharing information and exchanging ideas.
The Consortium welcomes diverse points of view. While we strive to maintain a high level of quality, research based information,
the opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position of the Consortium or the University of Minnesota,
nor does the Consortium or the University recommend, endorse, verify or confirm information submitted.
Copyright 2002, © University of Minnesota Children, Youth and Family Consortium.

This page was last updated on Monday, March 19, 2007 12:06 PM
Driving Directions Mail to: cyfc@umn.edu